Florida: Lower Kissimmee River (RCWP 14 A)

IMAGE

Okeechobee, Highlands, and Glades Counties
MLRA: U-156A
HUC:030901-02




4.1 Project Synopsis

In 1988, the Taylor Creek-Nubbin Slough (TCNS) project was expanded to include the Lower Kissimmee River Basin (LKR). The Lower Kissimmee River Basin is located in southern Florida west and adjacent to the TCNS Basin. Water flow from the LKR and its tributaries enters Lake Okeechobee through two flow control structures (S154 and S65E). The 223,700-acre watershed is a typically flat landscape with poorly drained soils having low phosphorus retention capacity.

Lake Okeechobee provides drinking and irrigation water, supports commercial and sport fishing, and is a habitat for many migratory and endemic bird species. High phosphorus (P) concentrations in Lake Okeechobee promote algal blooms and eutrophic conditions that impair all water uses.

The Lower Kissimmee River Basin is the second largest source of external phosphorus loading to Lake Okeechobee, delivering 20% of the total phosphorus (TP) and 25% of the total nitrogen in 31% of the inflow to the lake. The project seeks to reduce phosphorus loadings to Lake Okeechobee by 43%, as measured at the watershed outlets (S65E and S154).

Over 95% of the land use in the watershed is agricultural. Dairy and beef operations are the primary sources of phosphorus. Runoff from dairy holding areas and milking barns, direct stream access by large numbers of dairy cattle, and runoff from improved pastures are the main contributors. Most of the beef cattle pastures have been fertilized and surface drained to improve drainage during the wet season. The critical area covers 15,500 acres and includes all dairies in the project area. In 1988 there were 19 milking barns with approximately 12,655 milking cows in the project area. The number of milking barns decreased to 11 in 1992; however, the number of milking cows remained in excess of 10,000.

Regulation has played a major role in defining land treatment and water quality goals. The best management practices (BMPs) implemented through the Rural Clean Water Program (RCWP) project are directed toward recycling nutrients produced on the farm to comply with the 1987 Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) Dairy Rule. This rule requires dairies to collect and then dispose of runoff from milking barns and high animal intensity areas through spray irrigation, so that the phosphorus in the effluent is assimilated by plants or absorbed by soil. In addition, in 1989, the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) set standards for TP concentrations at tributary discharges and the basin outlet to meet the requirements of the 1987 Florida Surface Water Improvement Management Act (SWIM-Act).

The RCWP BMP emphasis includes animal waste management, diversion systems to capture effluent from milking barns, stream protection, fertilizer management, grazing land protection, permanent vegetative cover, and pesticide management.

The Lower Kissimmee River RCWP project has an extensive water quality monitoring program. Baseline water quality data have been collected since 1986. Since 1987, a combination of instream and BMP site-specific water quality monitoring stations have been employed to document long-term trends and the effectiveness of implementing a set of intensive animal waste management BMPs, combined with removing cows from the streams. Grab and time- weighted proportional samples were taken from major tributaries, water control structures, and at the major outflow of each dairy. The weekly grab samples are utilized to document long-term trends; the automated samples are utilized to quantify loads and determine the efficiency of individual management practices.

Beginning in October, 1991, the dairy monitoring program was streamlined to better support the FDER Dairy Rule. Monitoring of all dairy offsite discharges continues with grab samples taken two times per month.

By September, 1990, approximately 97% of the critical area was under contract and BMPs were 45% implemented. As of April, 1992, implementation of BMPs was complete on 100% of critical area, including all dairies. Cost share was available under RCWP and other federal and state programs.

The project did not start BMP implementation until 1988; therefore, changes in phosphorus loadings to Lake Okeechobee have not been quantified. However, BMPs appear to be improving water quality at individual dairies within a year after implementation. Preliminary results indicate that a reduction in TP has occurred on at least 80% of the dairies that have implemented BMPs.


IMAGE


Figure 4.4: Lower Kissimmee River (Florida) RCWP project map, FL-2.




4.2 Project Findings, Recommendations, and Successes

4.2.1 Definition of Project Objectives and Goals

4.2.1.1 Findings and Successes

The goals and objectives were refined from the experience of the RCWP effort in the Taylor Creek - Nubbin Slough Basin and from recent state regulations.

State regulations were used to establish both the land treatment and the water quality goals. The 1987 Florida Department of Environmental Regulation Dairy Rule requires dairies to collect and dispose of runoff from high animal intensity areas through spray irrigation, so that most of the phosphorus in the effluent is assimilated by plants or absorbed by soil (nutrient mass balance concept). In addition, in 1989, the SFWMD set standards for TP concentrations at tributary discharges, the basin outlet, and various land uses, to meet the requirements of the SWIM-Act. The project calculated its goal to reduce phosphorus and nitrogen loadings by 43% at the LKR Basin outlet by applying the basin discharge concentration standard required by the SWIM-Act (0.18 milligram P per liter, mg P/l) concentration at the watershed outlet to Lake Okeechobee.

From the experience in the TCNS Basin, intensive waste management BMPs, along with fencing to remove cows from the stream, were thought to be required to meet the water quality goals.

4.2.1.2 Recommendations

None

4.2.2 Project Management and Administration

4.2.2.1 Findings and Successes

The Lower Kissimmee River Basin portion of the Florida RCWP is administered as an expansion to the Taylor Creek - Nubbin Slough Basin RCWP project by the local Agricultural Stabilization Conservation Service (ASCS), in consultation with Soil Conservation Service (SCS), Cooperative Extension Service (CES), and the SFWMD.

4.2.2.2 Recommendations

None

4.2.3 Information and Education

4.2.3.1 Findings and Successes

Close cooperation among the four local key agencies (ASCS, SCS, CES, and SFWMD) has contributed to the success of the information and education (I&E) program.

4.2.3.2 Recommendations

None

4.2.4 Producer Participation

4.2.4.1 Findings and Successes

The majority of landowners are aware of the water quality problems and plan to participate in the RCWP.

The two most important reason farmers decided to participate is the availability of cost share funds (federal and state) and concern about meeting pollution regulations. Technical assistance was also important.

4.2.4.2 Recommendations

None

4.2.5 Land Treatment Implementation, Tracking, and Evaluation

4.2.5.1 Findings and Successes

There is a high level of BMP implementation on the dairy farms, most of which occurred after 1988. As of April, 1992, implementation of BMPs was complete on 100% of critical area, including all dairies. By September, 1990, approximately 97% of the critical area was under contract and BMPs were 45% implemented. Not all the contacts are under the RCWP. RCWP contracts cover 57% of the critical acres. The rest are cost shared under state programs or the federal Long Term Agreement (LTA) Program with ASCS's Agricultural Conservation Program (ACP) funds.

Regulation has played the major role in defining land treatment. The BMPs implemented through the RCWP project are directed toward recycling most of the nutrients produced on the farm to comply with the 1987 FDER Dairy Rule. This rule requires dairies to collect and dispose of runoff from high animal intensity areas through spray irrigation, so that phosphorus in the effluent is assimilated by plants or absorbed by soil (nutrient mass balance concept). In addition, in 1989, the SFWMD set standards for TP concentrations at tributary discharges and the basin outlet to meet the requirements of the SWIM-Act.

To meet the objective of substantial decreases in P loadings at the watershed outlet, the BMPs recommended by LOTAC (1986) were more intensive than those used in the Taylor Creek - Nubbin Slough Basin. The emphasis was on a set of expensive animal waste management BMPs to achieve nutrient mass balance, combined with removing cows from the streams.

Using the lessons learned from Taylor Creek - Nubbin Slough, priority of BMP components and implementation is based on expected water quality benefits.

Based on the Taylor Creek - Nubbin Slough portion of the project and other studies, the planned land treatment program, although costly, is thought to the be most cost effective method to achieve the desired P reduction. Alternatives for nutrient reduction, such as treatment plants, relocation of dairies, and total confinement operations are considered more costly.

4.2.5.2 Recommendations

Practices with the greatest water quality benefits should be prioritized and implemented first.

Close coordination between the project and regulatory agencies is needed in selecting and implementing BMPs.

Animal waste management and fertilizer management should be used as a complementary set of BMPs.

4.2.6 Water Quality Monitoring and Evaluation

4.2.6.1 Findings and Successes

The LKR project has an extensive water quality monitoring program. Baseline water quality data has been collected since 1986. Since 1987, a combination of instream and BMP site-specific water quality monitoring stations have been employed to document long-term trends and the effectiveness of implementing a set of intensive animal waste management BMPs, combined with removing cows from the streams. Grab and time-weighted proportional samples are taken on major tributaries, at water control structures, and at each of the major dairies. The weekly grab samples are utilized to document long-term trends and the automated samples are utilized to quantify loads.

Although monitoring the efficiency of individual BMPs was an original goal of the autosampling program, that goal was never realized, primarily due to the inter-relationships of the practices. For example, fencing to exclude cows from streams was implemented at the same time as fertilizer management, reduced phosphorus in the feed, and possibly portable shades or feed/water/shade in the high intensity areas around milking barns. Therefore, the monitoring program is not capable of separating the effects of the individual practices.

The project did not start BMP implementation until 1988; therefore, changes in phosphorus loadings to Lake Okeechobee have not been quantified. However, BMPs appear to be improving water quality at individual dairies within a year after implementation. Preliminary results indicate a reduction in TP has occurred on at least 80% of the dairies that have implemented BMPs.

4.2.6.2 Recommendations

Different spatial and temporal complexities (levels) of monitoring may be useful to address BMP effectiveness on a BMP site-specific location as compared to a subwatershed scale. For example, automatic samplers and load calculations may be required for site-specific BMP effectiveness monitoring.

4.2.7 Linkage of Land Treatment and Water Quality

4.2.7.1 Findings and Successes

Site-specific water quality monitoring in this project has been able to determine farm-level BMP effectiveness.

The project is conducting a study to document the effectiveness of implementing an expensive nutrient mass balance set of animal waste and fertilizer management BMPs, combined with preventing animal access to a stream.

More efficient use of dairy waste water and effective management of waste storage lagoons has resulted in improvements at the individual dairy operations and downstream water quality.

4.2.7.2 Recommendations

Water quality analysis should adjust for variations in flow, ground water, and changes in land use such as changes in cow numbers during the project period. For example, the water table depth was a surrogate for seasonality, in addition to a high water table contributing to increased phosphorus concentrations in the tributaries. Incorporation of these variables into the analyses allowed for greater evidence that the RCWP BMPs significantly decreased the phosphorus loadings.

The use of computer models is useful to predict the fate of nutrients on a field, subwatershed, and watershed scale as well as provide a mechanism for integration of multiple environmental variables such as rainfall, water table, soils, water quality, animal units, land area, topography, cow numbers, and flow.

4.3 Project Description

4.3.1 Project Type and Time Frame

General RCWP (an expansion of the Taylor Creek-Nubbin Slough RCWP project in 1988)

1988 - 1995

4.3.2 Water Resource and Watershed Descriptions

4.3.2.1 Water Resource and Water Quality

4.3.2.1.1 Water Resource Type and Size

Streams, canals, Lake Okeechobee

4.3.2.1.2 Water Uses and Impairments

Lake Okeechobee is a class I water resource covering 480,000 acres. The lake is the primary source of public drinking water for five towns around the lake and the secondary source for the lower east coast of Florida from West Palm Beach to Miami. Water from the lake is also used to irrigate about 500,000 acres of vegetable crops, row crops, sugar cane, and pasture south of the lake. The lake is part of a water management system providing flood protection.

The lake supports commercial fishing, valued at $6.3 million annually; sport fishing, valued at $2.2 million annually (Bell, 1987); a significant tourist industry; and habitat for many migratory as well as endemic bird species. A diverse wildlife habitat draws many tourists to the lake area.

High phosphorus (P) concentrations in Lake Okeechobee promote eutrophic conditions that promote algae blooms, with associated low dissolved oxygen levels, and impair all water uses.

4.3.2.1.3 Water Quality Problem Statement

The Lower Kissimmee River Basin is the second largest source of phosphorus (P) loading to Lake Okeechobee, delivering 20% of the total phosphorus and 25% of the total nitrogen to Lake Okeechobee with 31% of inflow to the lake (Lake Okeechobee Technical Advisory Committee, 1986).

Over 95% of the land use in the watershed is agricultural. Dairy and beef operations are the primary sources of P. Runoff from dairy holding areas, milking barns, direct stream access by large numbers of dairy cattle, and runoff from improved pastures are the main contributors. Most of the beef cattle pastures have been fertilized and surface drained to improve drainage during the wet season.

Phosphorus concentrations in runoff are high because the soils are sandy Spodosols with low phosphorus retention capacity and rainfall is in excess of evapotranspiration. Most of the P loss occurs in the dissolved phase as orthophosphate phosphorus (OP). The water table is usually high, and standing water occurs in low areas during the rainy season, June to October. Total phosphorus concentration in the tributaries are related to the water table depth and antecedent precipitation (Ritter and Flaig, 1987). Because the land is flat and poorly drained, most of the runoff occurs when the ground water table is close to the surface. Therefore, total phosphorus concentrations in the tributaries increases as the water table depth rises to within two feet of the surface.

4.3.2.1.4 Water Quality Objectives and Goals

The project seeks to reduce phosphorus loadings to Lake Okeechobee by 43%, measured at the watershed outlets (Flaig and Ritter, 1989).

4.3.2.2 Watershed Characteristics

4.3.2.2.1

Watershed Area: 223,700 acres
Project Area: 223,700 acres
Critical Area: 15,500 acres

4.3.2.2.2 Relevant Hydrologic, Geologic, and Meteorologic Factors

Mean Annual Precipitation: 50.0 inches (primarily from June to October)

Geologic Factors: Topography is relatively flat with an elevation range of about 40 feet (17 to 58 feet above mean sea level). Soils are coarse textured, mostly poorly drained with rapid surface permeability and moderate internal drainage. An organic hard pan underlies most of the area, typically within a depth of 30-50 inches from the surface.

Hydrologic Factors: The water table is very shallow. Seasonal ground water fluctuations are closely related to rainfall amount and intensity. In upland areas, the water table seasonally fluctuates from ground surface to three to five feet. In undrained flood plains and low-lying flood prone areas, the water table is above ground surface or very near the surface most of the year. Much of the watershed has been extensively drained for control of high water tables.

The Lower Kissimmee River is channelized (sometimes referred to as Canal 38) with flow control structures such as S-65C, S-65D, and S-65E. Water flow from the Lower Kissimmee River Basin and its tributaries enters Lake Okeechobee through flow control structures S-65E and S-154.

4.3.2.2.3 Project Area Agriculture

There are approximately 175 farms in the project area, mostly beef and dairy. The average size of the farms is 1278 acres.

4.3.2.2.4 Land Use

Use         %  of Project Area       %  of Critical Area
Cropland (mostly 
   citrus groves)         0.1       -
Pasture/range
Dairy (milk barns/pasture) 7 100 Beef grazing 91 - Woodland (and wet prairies) 1 - Urban/roads 1 - Other - -

4.3.2.2.5 Animal Operations

Operation   # Farms     Total #       Total Animal
      Animals     Units
Dairy*      15    18,000      25,200
Beef     155      68,500      68,500
* 1988 numbers (12,655 of the dairy animals were milking cows, the remaining were primarily dry cows and springers). In 1988, there were 19 milking barns. From May, 1989 to August, 1992, 7 milking barns chose to take advantage of the State Buy-out and closed. In January, 1992, another milking barn removed its cows due to participation in the Florida Save Our Rivers Program. In May of 1992, there were an estimated 10,930 milking cows (plus non-milking cows) and 11 milking barns in the LKR Basin.

4.3.3 Total Project Budget

 SOURCES   Federal     State    Farmer      Other
ACTIVITY                                        SUM
Cost Share  835,840     2,570,000         601,030            0 4,006,870
Info. & Ed.   110,000             0       0           0   110,000
Tech. Asst. 504,000          113,000        0             0   617,000
Water Quality     0     1,167,422        0             0 1,167,422**
   Monitoring

SUM         1,449,840*  3,850,422   601,030            0    $5,901,292
* $1,249,840 of this is RCWP funds; $200,000 in ACP funds were available for cost share to the dairies under the LTA program.

** Water quality monitoring budget only reflects FY87 - FY91 expenditures.

Source: Stanley and Gunsalus (1991) and personal communication, SFWMD staff

4.3.4 Information and Education

4.3.4.1 Strategy

Intensify the ongoing I&E effort currently in effect in the Taylor Creek - Nubbin Slough Basin project. CES is taking the lead role in information and education activities. ASCS, SCS, and the SFWMD also are playing key roles.

4.3.4.2 Objectives and Goals

Make landowners aware of the water quality problem and funding from the RCWP and the state

Keep farmers and public informed of the progress being made during the project towards realizing water quality benefits and goals

4.3.4.3 Program Components

Similar to I&E efforts under the RCWP in the Taylor Creek - Nubbin Slough Basin with:

4.3.5 Producer Participation

4.3.5.1 Level of Participation

There is a high level of BMP implementation on the dairy farms, most of which occurred after 1988. As of April, 1992, implementation of BMPs was complete on 100% of critical area, including all dairies. By September, 1990, approximately 97% of the critical area was under contract and BMPs were 45% implemented. Not all the contacts are under the RCWP. RCWP contracts cover 57% of the critical acres. The rest are cost shared under state programs or the LTA Program with federal ACP funds.

4.3.5.2 Incentives to Participation

RCWP cost share rate of 75% for structural BMPs

Supplemental federal funds under the LTA and from state funds

RCWP payment limit of $50,000 per landowner

Technical assistance for all contracted BMPs

Regulations: A FDER rule has been implemented which requires dairies whose drainage reach Lake Okeechobee to address areas of high cattle intensity on their farms. It was estimated that the average cost will be $238,000 per barn to comply with this rule. The actual costs were as much as two to three times this estimate.

The two most important reason farmers decided to participate was availability of cost share funds (federal and state) and concern about pollution regulations.

4.3.5.3 Barriers to Participation

High cost of BMPs

The $50,000 per farm cost share limit under RCWP has been a constraint to addressing the waste disposal problems of these dairies.

Implementing the nutrient mass balance concept at the farm level required innovative management strategies on the dairies that were expensive and required major management changes.

4.3.5.4 Chances of Continued Maintenance/Adoption of BMPs

Presently unknown, since the project is ongoing. The FDER Rule requires the continued operation and maintenance of the BMPs.

4.3.6 Land Treatment

4.3.6.1 Strategy and Design

Areas with high animal concentrations are targeted for priority treatment. BMPs are directed toward recycling nutrients produced on farm to comply with the FDER Dairy Rule requiring collection of runoff from high intensity areas and treatment of phosphorus (P) through spray irrigation, so that it assimilated by plants or absorbed by soil (nutrient mass balance).

4.3.6.2 Objectives and Goals

Objectives: Keep the nutrients on the farm and employ the nutrient mass balance concept

Goals: Contract 100% of the critical area

Contract all 15 dairy farms with their 19 milking barns in the project area.

This objective was modified to include only the 11 milking barns in the project area that did not cease operation as a result of the buyout programs.

Implement BMPs over a three-year period

4.3.6.3 Critical Area Criteria and Application

Criteria: All dairy farms in the project area

4.3.6.4 Best Management Practices Used

Emphasis of BMP contracts is on stream protection, reduction of barn waste by improving water use efficiency, and improving effluent disposal with spray irrigation, animal waste management systems, stream protection, and grazing land management. (BMP priority: 2, 5, 10, 15, 12, 6, 1, 16, and 8.) Emphasis is similar to the Taylor Creek-Nubbin Slough project, with greater emphasis on Waste Management Systems (BMP 2) to capture and recycle nutrients.

BMPs Utilized in the Project *:

*Please refer to Appendix I for description/purpose of BMPs

4.3.6.5 Land Treatment and Use Monitoring & Tracking Program

4.3.6.5.1 Description

Cost shared BMPs are monitored in terms of units installed and acres served (see Stanley et al., 1988). A summary of acres served by each BMP component and by installed (structural) BMP systems and management BMP systems is calculated. ASCS maintains the land treatment records and prepares reports. Cow numbers per subwatershed, per water quality monitoring station and per year are also estimated by a joint effort between the SFWMD and ASCS.

Non-cost shared BMPs were also included in the contracts so they could be tracked for implementation and costs.

4.3.6.5.2 Data Management

ASCS maintains the land treatment records and prepares reports.

4.3.6.5.3 Data Analysis and Results

Quantified Project Achievements (as of 9/30/90):
Critical Area Treatment Goals Pollutant Source Units Total % Implemented Total % Implemented Pasture/range acres 15,500 45%* 15,500 45%* Dairies- # milking 13 NA** 14 NA** barns Contracts # 15 NA** 15 NA** * These numbers reflect installed practices as of 9/30/90. As of this date, 97% of the critical were under contract (9 dairies had RCWP contracts on 8,883 acres or 57% of the critical area and 5 additional dairies had contracts under the LTA and/or state programs on 6,155 acres or 40% of the critical area). By December, 1991, implementation was 100% complete.

** As of 9/30/90, contracts had been made on 13 milking barns (9 under RCWP and 4 with the LTA or state programs). Implementation was in progress on 9 contracts and 1 contract was completely installed. By April, 1992, implementation was 100% complete on 11 milking barns.

Source: Stanley and Gunsalus (1991)

4.3.7 Water Quality Monitoring and Evaluation

4.3.7.1 Strategy and Design

A combination of instream and BMP site-specific monitoring stations was used to determine the reduction in phosphorus concentrations as a result of implementation of BMPs. There are three sets (or levels) of water quality monitoring objectives based on three spatial and temporal levels of detail; each set has a corresponding degree of water quality monitoring complexity. Weekly grab samples allow assessment of long-term trends in the tributary and basin outlet. Automated samples are used to calculate loadings. Individual dairies are monitored with grab samples taken two times per month.

The monitoring is performed by the SFWMD, Okeechobee, Florida.

4.3.7.2 Objectives and Goals

Overall Objectives:

4.3.7.3 Time Frame

RCWP monitoring is from 1987 to 1995 for Levels 1 and 3

RCWP monitoring is from implementation date to 1995 for Level 3

Some baseline data has been collected since January 1986 at selected tributary sites

Monitoring is planned to continue after 1995 by the SFWMD

Flow control structure S-154 (on a tributary to LKR) has been monitored since 1973

Flow control structure S-65E has been monitored since 1982

Level 1 monitoring will continue to support the FDER after the RCWP project ends

4.3.7.4 Sampling Scheme

4.3.7.4.1 Monitoring Stations

Instream grab and automatic sampler stations

Individual dairy and beef sites with automatic and weekly grab samplers

Ground water: Ground water levels are monitored two times per month at 11 sites

4.3.7.4.2 Sample Type

Grab and event sampling (with automatic samplers)

4.3.7.4.3 Sampling Frequency

Dairy grab samples every two weeks, weekly for tributary, daily for automatic sampler samples, and one dairy spray field. In addition, continuous automated samplers collecting time-proportional water samples are used on major tributaries, at water control structures along major canals (S-65C, D, and E). Initially, automatic samplers were used at each major dairy. Sampling at the dairies was changed to weekly during the first few years and then to every two weeks in November of 1991.

4.3.7.4.4 Variables Analyzed

Total phosphorus (TP), orthophosphate-P (OP), nitrite plus nitrate-N (NO2 +NO3-N), ammonia-N (NH3-N), total Kjeldahl-N (TKN), pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, temperature, chlorides, and color.

Dairies are monitored for TP and TKN only.

4.3.7.4.5 Flow Measurement

Stream stage (where available) and flow conditions are recorded with each water quality sample.

4.3.7.4.6 Meteorologic Measurements

Precipitation and ground water table depth are monitored at several sites within the project area.

Temperature and evaporation is also measured.

4.3.7.4.7 Other Important Water Quality Monitoring and Evaluation Information

Surface ground water table levels are monitored at key dairies within the project area.

4.3.7.5 Data Management

All chemical data are stored locally by the SFWMD. In 1991, the PC-based lotus files were converted to a mainframe ORACLE data base.

Ground water level data are stored in a PC-based Lotus file by the SFWMD.

4.3.7.6 Data Analysis and Results

Analysis:

Exploratory data analysis includes: 1) tabular presentation of the annual means for water quality concentrations at each station and 2) time plots.

Water quality trend detection techniques includes: 1) nonparametric tests to detect linear trends over time and 2) the double mass curve method to correct the data for changes in hydrologic variation using rainfall and ground water stage data.

Water quality modeling is being used to develop a watershed phosphorus transport model.

Time series analysis will be used to examine trends (step and linear) over multiple years. Changes in ground water table depth and cow numbers will be incorporated to adjust for changes in water quality not directly related to the RCWP.

Load reductions will be estimated based on hydraulic model simulations.

Results:

The project did not start implementation until 1988; therefore, changes in phosphorus loadings to Lake Okeechobee from this watershed due to RCWP have not been quantified.

For most of the dairies, the quality of agricultural runoff from improved pastures and dairies is poor and well above the standards allowed for land uses (Flaig and Ritter, 1989).

BMPs appear to be improving water quality at individual dairies a year after implementation (Flaig and Ritter, 1989; Stanley and Gunsalus, 1991). BMPs appear to be improving water quality at individual dairies within a year after implementation. Preliminary results indicate a reduction in TP has occurred on at least 80% of the dairies that have implemented BMPs.

TP concentrations have decreased at flow control structure S- 65E during the 1980s, possibly from improvements prior to the RCWP project (Flaig and Ritter, 1989).

TP concentrations have increased dramatically over the last 15 years at flow control structure S-154, probably from increased dairy activity in the basin (Flaig and Ritter, 1989).

Phosphorus concentrations in discharges at the outlet from this project area may exceed 1.0 milligram/liter (mg/l). Baseline data are currently being evaluated.

4.3.8 Linkage of Land Treatment and Water Quality

Effectiveness of BMPs: The project is conducting a study to document the effectiveness of implementing an expensive 'nutrient mass balance' set of animal waste management BMPs combined with removing cows from a stream. Implementation was initiated in 1988 and only baseline data are available at this time. A combination of site-specific and tributary monitoring/modeling, along with simultaneous land treatment/use and ground water monitoring, should be effective in evaluating BMP effectiveness.

4.3.9 Impact of Other Federal and State Programs on the Project

The 1987 FDER Dairy Rule and the 1987 State of Florida Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Plan dictated the focus of the water quality goals and the associated land treatment emphasis for the LKR Basin. The FDER Dairy Rule required that each dairy perform nutrient management such that minimum phosphorus left the operation. In 1989, the SFWMD set standards for TP concentrations at tributary discharges and the basin outlet to meet the requirements of the SWIM Plan. The standard set for the basin discharge was TP = 0.18 mg/l. To comply with this standard, allowable discharge standards were made for runoff concentrations at various land uses (1.2 mg P/l for dairies, 0.35 mg P/l for improved pastures, heifer operations, and beef cattle; 0.18 mg P/l for native range; and 1.2 mg P/l for all other land uses). The P and N loading reduction goal of 43% from the project area to Lake Okeechobee was established by applying the basin discharge concentration standard required by the SWIM-Act to the average annual discharge for each basin (Flaig and Ritter, 1989).

Financial assistance for animal waste management systems is also available through the federal LTA and state cost share programs, in addition to the RCWP. These monies allow for a greater portion of the expensive systems to be cost shared than would be allowed under the RCWP.

State and federal dairy buy-out programs decreased the number of milking barns in the LKR Basin from 19 in 1988 to 11 in 1992. However, the number of milking cows decreased only by 14%.

4.3.10 Other Pertinent Information

None

4.3.11 References

A complete list of all project documents and other relevant publications may be found in Appendix IV.

Bell, F.W. 1987. Economic Impact and Evaluation of the Recreation and Commercial Fishing Industries of Lake Okeechobee, Florida. Dept. Economics, Florida State University, Tallahassee.

Flaig, E.G. and G. Ritter. 1989. Water Quality Monitoring of Agricultural Discharge to Lake Okeechobee. ASAE Paper No. 89-2525, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI. 17p.

Lake Okeechobee Technical Advisory Committee (LOTAC). 1986. The overall review of South Florida Water Management District Lake Okeechobee research, Final report to Florida Department of Environmental Regulation.

Ritter, G. and E.G. Flaig. 1987. 1986 Annual Report - Rural Clean Water Program. Technical Memorandum. South Florida Water Management district, West Palm Beach, Florida. 71p.

Stanley, J. W. and B. Gunsalus. 1991. Taylor Creek Nubbin Slough Project, Rural Clean Water Program Okeechobee, Florida Ten Year Report 1981 - 1990. Cooperators: Okeechobee ASCS, Okeechobee CES, Okeechobee SCS, and the South Florida Water Management District. Okeechobee RCWP Local Coordinating Committee, Okeechobee, Florida. 231p.

Stanley, J., V. Hoge, L. Boggs, G. Ritter. 1988. Lower Kissimmee River Project, Rural Clean Water Program Annual Progress Report. Okeechobee County, Okeechobee, FL.

4.3.12 Project Contacts

Administration

Diane N. Conway
USDA-ASCS
609 SW Park St.
Okeechobee, Florida 34972
(813) 763-3345

Water Quality

Greg Sawka / Joe Albers
South Florida Water Management District
1000 NE 40th Ave.
Okeechobee, Florida 34973
(813) 763- 3776

Land Treatment

District Conservationist
USDA-SCS
611 SW Park St.
Okeechobee, Florida 34972
(813) 763-3619

Information and Education

Vickie Hoge
CES
501 N.W. Fifth Ave.
Okeechobee, FL 34972
(813) 763-6469